<?xml version="1.0"?><rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>That Web Guy Blog</title>
	<link>http://www.thatwebguyblog.com/</link>
	<description>Design, According to That Web Guy.</description>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://www.thatwebguyblog.com/rss.php</docs>
			
				    
		    <item>
			    <title><![CDATA[Sweet Links plug-in for Wordpress TinyMCE Advanced]]></title>
			    <description><![CDATA[Having worked entirely with Wordpress customisation the past few months, it became quite apparent early on that there are some obvious limitations with the default WYSYWG editor - TinyMCE.
Training clients to use TinyMCE in a CMS environment is pretty smooth right up to the part when I show them how to create a link to an existing page or post. The (reasonable) expectation is that the 'insert link' dialogue should display a list of every page, post or file you've added and created, and then simply select one to make the link.
Unfortunately that's not how it wor....]]></description>
			    <link><![CDATA[http://www.thatwebguyblog.com/show_article.php?id=2687]]></link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 21:05:57 +0800</pubDate>
				<guid><![CDATA[http://www.thatwebguyblog.com/show_article.php?id=2687]]></guid>
		    </item>
		    
		    		    
		    <item>
			    <title><![CDATA[Graceful Degradation and Progressive Enhancement. Which do you practice?]]></title>
			    <description><![CDATA[If you've ever been confused by the differences between these to practices, you're not alone. Ask your designer buddy sitting in the cubicle next to you which one of these web development methodologies he or she practices the most, chances are they're not sure or they might even think they're doing neither.
So what is the difference between Graceful Degradation and Progressive Enhancement? When described out aloud they sound pretty much the same, but they have a slightly different focus which will affect your work-flow. But ultimately both have the same admiral goal in....]]></description>
			    <link><![CDATA[http://www.thatwebguyblog.com/show_article.php?id=2686]]></link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 17:41:15 +0800</pubDate>
				<guid><![CDATA[http://www.thatwebguyblog.com/show_article.php?id=2686]]></guid>
		    </item>
		    
		    		    
		    <item>
			    <title><![CDATA[Identifying the semantics in your design]]></title>
			    <description><![CDATA[So you're sites are validating now and that's fantastic. Pat yourself on the back. But validation isn't the only thing you need to be concerned with. Organising your mark-up in an easily manageable semantic fashion is the next part of the puzzle. Though unfortunately unlike the W3C validation service and many other developer assists, there are no tools designed to  check if your mark-up is semantic.
This makes it more or less an honour system by which only  you (and your peers!) can judge if you're do....]]></description>
			    <link><![CDATA[http://www.thatwebguyblog.com/show_article.php?id=2685]]></link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 08:42:35 +0800</pubDate>
				<guid><![CDATA[http://www.thatwebguyblog.com/show_article.php?id=2685]]></guid>
		    </item>
		    
		    		    
		    <item>
			    <title><![CDATA[Eight harsh truths for clients about web design]]></title>
			    <description><![CDATA[Every now and then we all have to deal with a client who has &lsquo;interesting&rsquo; ideas for their web site. You know the type &ndash; the guy who wants an animated background, or the girl who insists on having all the text coloured light grey on a white background at 10 points.
When it comes to web design, I&rsquo;m a firm believer in the philosophy that the client is rarely if ever right. I justify this seemingly obtuse position like this: Would you tell a pilot how to fly an aeroplane? Or tell a mechanic how to fix your car? Of course you wouldn&rsquo;t, because....]]></description>
			    <link><![CDATA[http://www.thatwebguyblog.com/show_article.php?id=2684]]></link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:47:41 +0800</pubDate>
				<guid><![CDATA[http://www.thatwebguyblog.com/show_article.php?id=2684]]></guid>
		    </item>
		    
		    		    
		    <item>
			    <title><![CDATA[Adobe WorkflowLab: Worth keeping an eye on]]></title>
			    <description><![CDATA[Adobes' new Air application WorkflowLab is an attempt to simplify the process of introducing the stages involved in  projects to team members, who may or may not have already tackled said projects previously. Yeah it's a work flow application.
Having such a tool is a great way to make it easy for a new team member to hit the ground running, or anyone for that matter to have their hand held through each stage of development.
In this industry there is obviously a high reliance on Adobe products so it makes sense tha....]]></description>
			    <link><![CDATA[http://www.thatwebguyblog.com/show_article.php?id=2683]]></link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 07:32:42 +0800</pubDate>
				<guid><![CDATA[http://www.thatwebguyblog.com/show_article.php?id=2683]]></guid>
		    </item>
		    
		    		    
		    <item>
			    <title><![CDATA[Create a CSS image sprite based feature box]]></title>
			    <description><![CDATA[Inspired by some of the excellent feature boxes I've seen on countless sites, I thought it about time I made my own but only using CSS and the excellent image sprite technique. Not familiar with image sprites? Here's a quick primer.
Note that this feature box would still work perfectly fine if you were to have each image separate, but less images means less HTTP requests and a less 'laggy' responsiveness for the user. Here's what it looks like:
....]]></description>
			    <link><![CDATA[http://www.thatwebguyblog.com/show_article.php?id=2682]]></link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 08:26:35 +0800</pubDate>
				<guid><![CDATA[http://www.thatwebguyblog.com/show_article.php?id=2682]]></guid>
		    </item>
		    
		    		    
		    <item>
			    <title><![CDATA[A few good practices for optimising your CSS]]></title>
			    <description><![CDATA[Like any programming language, CSS can be used in many ways while still achieving the same result. And although sometimes there isn't necessarily just a single 'correct' way to achieve a certain goal, one thing we can all agree on is that clean optimal code is always better than bloated code.
With this in mind I thought I'd share some of the techniques that if you aren't already practising them, maybe this article will inspire you to start.
Use CSS Shorthand
This is  the art of combining all the properties of an element into a single line. Some exampl....]]></description>
			    <link><![CDATA[http://www.thatwebguyblog.com/show_article.php?id=2681]]></link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 08:13:06 +0800</pubDate>
				<guid><![CDATA[http://www.thatwebguyblog.com/show_article.php?id=2681]]></guid>
		    </item>
		    
		    		    
		    <item>
			    <title><![CDATA[Fixing the 'read more' problem]]></title>
			    <description><![CDATA[In my continuing journey to be as anal as humanly possible regarding web standards, I thought it about time to look at one of my pet peeves - the 'read more' link, also commonly known as  'more info' and sometimes 'keep reading'.
You know what I'm talking about of course. The links like you see on the homepage of this very blog, where content is truncated and followed by a 'read more' link leading to the full article.
There's nothing wrong with this practice and in fact it it's an ideal way of fitting points of interest on a single page, especially when you nee....]]></description>
			    <link><![CDATA[http://www.thatwebguyblog.com/show_article.php?id=2680]]></link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:13:51 +0800</pubDate>
				<guid><![CDATA[http://www.thatwebguyblog.com/show_article.php?id=2680]]></guid>
		    </item>
		    
		    		    
		    <item>
			    <title><![CDATA[Mobile web design: What I've learned]]></title>
			    <description><![CDATA[Just like designing for the desktop screen, designing for mobile devices comes with its own set of hurdles and considerations.
Not all mobile browsers are created equal, and you'll need to be aware of their positive aspects and failures alike. Some mobile browsers allow you to zoom in and out of a page for easy access to links, some don't. Some allow you to change the aspect ratio and some don't. And of course mobile devices have varying screen resolutions, and are nowhere near the same as their desktop counterparts. If you thought designing for 800x600 years ago was p....]]></description>
			    <link><![CDATA[http://www.thatwebguyblog.com/show_article.php?id=2677]]></link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:27:39 +0800</pubDate>
				<guid><![CDATA[http://www.thatwebguyblog.com/show_article.php?id=2677]]></guid>
		    </item>
		    
		    		    
		    <item>
			    <title><![CDATA[That Web Guy Blog goes mobile]]></title>
			    <description><![CDATA[It's been a long time coming, but thanks to the consistent nagging of a certain few subscribers (don't worry, I won't call you out) you can now enjoy this blog in a handy mobile device formatted flavour.
So far I've been able to test on the Nokia Mobile Browser, Opera Mini 4 and the new Opera Mini 5 (beta), and I've received feedback from a twitter follower who says it &quot;seems to run fine on iPod touch running OS 3.0 and safari&quot;.
I'd be appreciative of anyone who can give me feedback regarding their mobile browser of choice.
Scrutinise it at ....]]></description>
			    <link><![CDATA[http://www.thatwebguyblog.com/show_article.php?id=2676]]></link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 08:46:36 +0800</pubDate>
				<guid><![CDATA[http://www.thatwebguyblog.com/show_article.php?id=2676]]></guid>
		    </item>
		    
		    	</channel>
</rss>